A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ahmad, Nasim
- Economic Analysis of Growth, Instability and Resource Use Efficiency of Sugarcane Cultivation in India:An Econometric Approach
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), Bihar-848 125, IN
2 Extension Education, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), Bihar-848 125, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Economics and Development, Vol 6, No 4 (2018), Pagination: 1-10Abstract
Objectives: To find out the growth, as well as instability in area, production and productivity of sugarcane farming and to assess the resource use efficiency in major sugarcane growing states of India and trade performance of sugar.
Methods/Statistical Analysis: Investigation is based on secondary data of area, production and productivity of sugarcane in major sugarcane growing states of India for the period from 2000-01 to 2015-16. Efficiency of sugarcane production was estimated using plot level data obtained from website of Cost of Cultivation Scheme, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India for the year, 2014-15. Compound growth rates, instability indices using formula suggested by Cuddy- Della Valle, and resource use efficiency using Data Envelopment approach (DEA) were computed.
Findings: At national level area, production and productivity of sugarcane went up during the period of investigation. Similar result was also observed in case of growth rates of sugarcane crop which were found positive and encouraging. The area under sugarcane was found stable in the states like Uttar Pradesh, Uttrakhand and Gujarat on the other hand the yield of sugarcane recorded almost stable in Uttar Pradesh, Uttrakhand and Tamil Nadu. Technical efficiency at national level in sugarcane production was found to be 66% which indicated that the production of crop may further be raised by 34% with the available technology. Allocative mean efficiencies indicated that costs may be reduced by 40% through using optimum combination of inputs keeping in mind their prices while selecting their quantities. The cost efficiency (CE) asserted that farmers may potentially reduce their overall cost of sugarcane production, upto 60% to harvest the existing level of output at least cost. Undoubtedly, the export of sugar from India has increased during the period of investigation.
Applications/Improvements: State government initiatives were found appreciable making sugarcane cultivation more remunerative. Proper use of scarce resources may make it more productive and profitable and realizing the objective of doubling income and uplifting standard of cultivators.
Keywords
Sugarcane, Data Envelopment Approach, Resource Use Efficiency, Technical Efficiency, Allocative Efficiency, Cost Efficiency.References
- Commission for agricultural costs and prices. Price Policy for Sugarcane. 2015; 1-80.
- K.M. Arjun. Indian agriculture- status, importance and role in Indian economy. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology. 2013, 4(4), 343-346.
- V.P. Sharma. India’s agrarian crisis and smallholder producers’ participation in new farm supply chain initiatives: a case study of contract farming. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2007.
- Onwueme IC, Sinha TD. CTA field crop production in tropical Africa. CTA, WageNingen, Netherlands. 1991; 401-411.
- Directorate of Economics and Statistics. http://des.kar.nic.in/. Date accessed: 07/05/2016.
- R.K. Rout, A.K. Behera, P.K. Padhiary, A. Nanda, A. Nayak, D. Behra, T. Das. A study on resource use efficiency of sugarcane farms: evidence from village level study in Orissa, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017, 6(11), 1955-1962.
- Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. http://eands.dacnet.nic.in/. Date accessed: 26/02/2018.
- J.D.A. Cuddy, P.A. Della Valle. Measuring the instability of time series data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 1978; 40, 79-85.
- M.J. Farrel. The measurement of productivity efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1957; 120(3), 253-290.
- R.D. Banker, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 1984; 30(9), 1078-92.
- A. Charnes, W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. Measuring efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978; 2(6), 429-444.
- T. Coelli, P.D.S. Rao, E.B. George. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwar Academic Publisher, London. 1998.
- N. Ahmad, D.K. Sinha, K.M. Singh, R.R. Mishra. Growth performance and resource use efficiency of maize in Bihar: economic perspectives. Journal of Agriculture Search. 2017; 4(1), 71-75
- N. Ahmad, D.K. Sinha, K.M. Singh. Estimating production efficiency in rice cultivation of Bihar: an economic approach. Economic Affair. 2017; 62(3), 1-8
- A. Kumar, R. Singh. Risk analysis in sugarcane production: evidences from Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra states of India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017, 6(9), 1211-1216.
- J.M. John, S.S. Mali. An economic analysis of area, production, yield and export of sugarcane in India. Acme Intellects International Journal of Research in Management, Social Sciences and Technology. 2016; 16(16), 1-17.
- A. Saravanan. Resource use efficiency of sugarcane production in Sathyamangalam Taluk of Erode district of Tamil Nadu: An economic analysis. Agricultural Situation in India. 2016; 21-28.
- Challenges and issues of groundwater management in India
Authors
1 Inter Public Group, Mediabrands, Mumbai 400 072, India, IN
2 PG College of Agriculture, Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur 848 125, India, IN
3 Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur 848 125, India, IN
4 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 123, No 7 (2022), Pagination: 856-864Abstract
This study reviews groundwater status and management based on the existing literature regarding its resource endowment, hydrogeology, challenges and issues of management and policy suggestions for India. Efficient management requires decoupling groundwater rights from land-ownership rights, changes in electricity pricing and metering, aquifer-based plans for storage and replenishment, and empowerment of participatory irrigation management for local management. Issues of water–food–energy nexus, climate change, carbon footprint of groundwater extraction and virtual water trade are also important for ensuring sustainable management of groundwater resourcesReferences
- GoI, Ground Water Year Book – India, 2019–2020, Central Ground-water Board (CGWB), Government of India, 2020.
- Mukherji, A., Sustainable groundwater management in India needs a water–energy–food nexus approach. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 2020, 1–17; doi:10.1002/aepp.13123.
- GoI, Ground water management and ownership. Report of the Expert Group, NITI Aayog, Government of India, 2007.
- Suhag, R., Overview of groundwater in India. eSoc. Sci., 2016; https://bit.ly/3qd13hN.
- Vaidyanathan, A., Agricultural Growth: The Role of Technology, Incentives, and Institutions, Oxford University Press, 2009.
- Dangar, S., Asoka, A. and Mishra, V., Causes and implications of groundwater depletion in India: a review. J. Hydrol., 2021, 596, 1–21.
- Singh, K. M., Singh, R. K. P., Meena, M. S. and Kumar Abhay, Indian National Water Policy: a review. Water Manage. Agric., 2015, 47–64.
- GoI, National compilation on dynamic ground water resources of India 2017, CGWB, Government of India, 2017.
- Saha, D. and Ray, R. K., Groundwater resources of India: potential, challenges and management: issues and challenges in South Asia. Groundwater Dev. Manage., 2019, 21–44; doi:org/10.1007/978-3-319-75115-3_2.
- Chindarkar, N. and Grafton, R. Q., India’s depleting groundwater: when science meets policy. Asia Pac. Policy Stud., 2019, 1–17; doi.org/10.1002/app5.269.
- Cullet, P., Model Groundwater (Sustainable Management) Bill, 2017: a new paradigm for groundwater regulation. Indian Law Rev., 2018, 2(3), 263–276.
- Podgorski, J. E., Labhasetwar, P., Saha, D. and Berg, M., Prediction modelling and mapping of groundwater fluoride contamination throughout India. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018, 52, 9889–9898; 10.1021/acs.est.8b01679.
- Zaveri, E., Grogan, D. S. and Fisher, V. K., Invisible water, visible impact: groundwater use and Indian agriculture under climate change. Environ. Res. Lett., 2016, 11; doi.org/10.1088/1748, 9326/11/8/084005.
- Meghwal, R., Shah, D. and Mishra, V., On the changes in ground-water storage variability in Western India using GRACE and well observations. Remote Sensing Earth Syst. Sci., 2019, 2, 260–272; doi.org/10.1007/s41976-019-00026-6.
- Asoka, A., Gleeson, T., Wada, Y. and Mishra, V., Relative contribution of monsoon precipitation and pumping to changes in groundwater storage in India. Nature Geosci., 2017, 10, 109–117; doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2869.
- Panda, D. K. and Wahr, J., Spatiotemporal evolution of water storage changes in India from the updated GRACE-derived gravity records. Water Resour. Res., 2016, 52, 135–149; doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017797.
- Joshi, S. K., Shive, P. R., Sinha, R. and Gupta, S., Tracing ground-water recharge sources in the northwestern Indian alluvial aquifer using water isotopes. J. Hydrol., 2018, 599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.056.
- Kulkarni, H., Shah, M. and Shankar, P. S. V., Shaping the contours of groundwater governance in India. J. Hydrol. A, 2015, 4, 172–192; doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.11.004.
- Kulkarni, H. and Shankar, P. S. V., Groundwater: towards an aquifer management framework. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2009, 44, 13–15.
- UN, World population prospects. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2019; population.un.org/wpp/
- Pingali, P., Aiyar, A., Abraham, M. and Rahman, A., Transforming food systems for a rising India. In Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, ISBN 978-3-030-14409-8.
- Alae-Carew, C., Bird, F. A., Chudhury, S. and Harris, F., Future diets in India: a systematic review of food consumption projection studies. Global Food Sec., 2019,
- , 182–190. 23. Bassi, N., Dinesh Kumar, M., Sharma, A. and Pardha-Saradhi, P., Status of wetlands in India: a review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. J. Hydrol., 2014, 2, 1–19.
- Sarkar, A., Socio-economic implications of depleting groundwater resource in Punjab: a comparative analysis of different irrigation systems. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2011, 46(7), 59–66.
- Kumar, P. et al., Down scaled climate change projections with uncertainty assessment over India using a high resolution multi-model approach. Sci. Total Environ., 2013, 468–469, S18–S30; doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.051.
- Krishnaswamy, J., Bonell, M. and Venkatesh, B., The groundwater recharge response and hydrologic services of tropical humid forest ecosystems to use and reforestation: support for the infiltration–evapotranspiration trade-off hypothesis. J. Hydrol., 2013, 498, 191–209; doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.034.
- Condon, L. E. and Maxwell, R. M., Simulating the sensitivity of evapotranspiration and streamflow to large-scale groundwater depletion. Sci. Adv., 2019, 5, eaav4574; doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav4574.
- Foster, S. S. D. and Chilton, P. J., Groundwater: the processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philos. Trans. B, 2003, 358, 1957–1972; dx.doi.org/10.1098%2Frstb.2003.1380.
- Rudolph, L. I. and Rudolph, H., In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1987.
- Shah, T., Giordano, M. and Mukherji, A., Political economy of the energy–groundwater nexus in India: exploring issues and assessing policy options. J. Hydrol., 2012, 20, 995–1006; doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0816-0.
- Barik, B., Ghosh, S., Sahana, A. S., Pathak, A. and Sekhar, M., Water–food–energy nexus with changing agricultural scenarios in India during recent decades, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2017, 21, 3041–3060; doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3041-2017.
- Kumar, D. M., Impact of electricity prices and volumetric water allocation on energy and groundwater demand management: analysis from Western India. Energy Policy, 2005, 33, 39–51; doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00196-4.
- Shah, T., Climate change and groundwater: India’s opportunities for mitigation and adaptation. Environ. Res. Lett., 2009, 4, doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035005.
- Rao, N. D., Jihoon, M., DeFries, R., Ghosh-Jera, S., Valin, H. and Fanzo, J., Healthy, affordable and climate-friendly diets in India. Global Environ. Change, 2018, 154–165; doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.013.
- Van der Kooij, S., Zwarteveen, M. Z., Boesveld, H. and Kuper, M., The efficiency of drip irrigation unpacked. Agric. Water Manage., 2013, 123, 103–110; doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.03.014.
- Kishore, A., Understanding agrarian impasse in Bihar. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2014, 39, 3484–3491.
- Shah, T. and Kishore, A., Solar-powered pump irrigation and India’s groundwater economy: a preliminary discussion of opportunities and threats. Water Policy Research Highlight-26, IWMI-TATA, 2012; www.iwmi.org/iwmi-tata/apm2012.
- Gosain, A. K., Rao, S. and Busaray, D., Impact assessment of climate change on water resources of two river systems in India. Curr. Sci., 2006, 90, 3.
- Aadhar, S. and Mishra, V., Increased drought risk in South Asia under warming climate: implications of uncertainty in potential evapotranspiration estimates. J. Hydrometeorol., 2020; doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-19-0224.1.
- Badiani, R. and Jessoe, K. K., The impact of electricity subsidies on groundwater extraction and agricultural production. Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics. Davis, CA, USA, 2011; http://are.berkeley.edu/documents/seminar/JessoeDraft.pdf.
- GoI, Dynamic groundwater resources of India. CGWB, Government of India, 2008.
- Lalwani, V., As the water crisis deepens, can India afford to leave groundwater unregulated? 2019; Scroll.in.
- GoI, Institutional framework for regulating use of ground water in India. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, 2009.
- World Bank, Agricultural land (% of land area), 2017; dataworldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.AGRI.ZS?year_high_desc=false.
- GoI, River development and Ganga rejuvenation, CGWB, Government of India, 2013.
- Ananda, J. and Aheeyar, M., An evaluation of groundwater institutions in India: a property rights perspective. Environ., Dev. Sustain., 2020, 22, 7531–5749; doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00448-8.
- Diwakara, H. and Nagaraja, N., Negative impacts of emerging informal groundwater markets in peninsular India: reduced local food security and unemployment. J. Soc. Econ. Dev., 2003, 5(1), 90–105.
- Dhawan, V., Water and agriculture in India: status, challenges and possible options for action. Background Paper for the South Asia Expert Panel during the Global Forum for Food and Agriculture, 2017; www.oav.de/fileadmin/user_upload/5_Publikationen/5_Studien/170118_Study_Water_Agriculture_India.pdf.
- Green, R. F., Joy, E. J. M. and Harris, F., Greenhouse gas emissions and water footprints of typical dietary patterns in India. Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 643, 1411–1418.
- Mishra, V., Asoka, A., Vatta, K. and Lall, U., Groundwater depletion and associated CO2 emissions in India. Earth’s Future, 2018, 6, 1672–1681.
- Rajan, A., Ghosh, K. and Shah, A., Carbon footprint of India’s groundwater irrigation. Carbon Manage., 2020, 11(3), 265–280; doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1750265.
- Ryan, N. and Sudarshan, A., Rationing the commons. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 27473, 2020; doi: 10.3386/w27473.
- Sayre, S. S. and Taraz, V., Groundwater depletion in India: social losses from costly well deepening. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 2019, 92, 85–100.
- Sidhu, B., Kandlikar, S. M. and Ramankutty, N., Power tariffs for groundwater irrigation in India: a comparative analysis of the environmental, equity, and economic tradeoffs. World Dev., 2020, 128, 104836; doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104836.
- Gulati, M. and Pahuja, S., Direct delivery of power subsidy to manage energy–groundwater–agriculture nexus. Aquat. Procedia, 2015, 5, 22–30; doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.10.005.